Vishnu Shankar Jain

Addressed another false claim. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/supreme-court-refuses-to-stay-krishna-janmabhoomi-survey-order/articleshow/106016875.cms

← Previous revision		Revision as of 20:19, 27 February 2026
Line 26:		Line 26:
	He was a petitioner to demand the survey of the existing [[Gyanvapi Mosque]] complex where he claimed a "[[Lingam]]" was discovered.{{Cite news\|title=Gyanvapi dispute {{!}} Now, masjid panel too seeks removal of Vishnu Shankar Jain over 'conflict'\|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/gyanvapi-dispute-now-masjid-panel-too-seeks-removal-of-vishnu-shankar-jain-over-conflict/article65636033.ece\|work=The Hindu\|date=2022-07-13\|access-date=2026-01-30\|issn=0971-751X\|language=en-IN\|first=Abhinay\|last=Lakshman}}{{Cite web\|title=Gyanvapi case: The father-son lawyer duo at centre of string of petitions\|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/political-pulse/the-sunday-profile-father-son-and-holy-suits-7941735/\|website=The Indian Express\|date=2022-09-12\|access-date=2026-01-30\|language=en}}{{Cite web \|title=“Not legally possible…” Vishnu Shankar Jain as petitioner seeks out-of-court settlement in Gyanvapi case \|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/videos/news/not-legally-possible-vishnu-shankar-jain-as-petitioner-seeks-out-of-court-settlement-in-gyanvapi-case/videoshow/102809401.cms \|access-date=2026-02-23 \|website=The Times of India \|language=en}}		He was a petitioner to demand the survey of the existing [[Gyanvapi Mosque]] complex where he claimed a "[[Lingam]]" was discovered.{{Cite news\|title=Gyanvapi dispute {{!}} Now, masjid panel too seeks removal of Vishnu Shankar Jain over 'conflict'\|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/gyanvapi-dispute-now-masjid-panel-too-seeks-removal-of-vishnu-shankar-jain-over-conflict/article65636033.ece\|work=The Hindu\|date=2022-07-13\|access-date=2026-01-30\|issn=0971-751X\|language=en-IN\|first=Abhinay\|last=Lakshman}}{{Cite web\|title=Gyanvapi case: The father-son lawyer duo at centre of string of petitions\|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/political-pulse/the-sunday-profile-father-son-and-holy-suits-7941735/\|website=The Indian Express\|date=2022-09-12\|access-date=2026-01-30\|language=en}}{{Cite web \|title=“Not legally possible…” Vishnu Shankar Jain as petitioner seeks out-of-court settlement in Gyanvapi case \|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/videos/news/not-legally-possible-vishnu-shankar-jain-as-petitioner-seeks-out-of-court-settlement-in-gyanvapi-case/videoshow/102809401.cms \|access-date=2026-02-23 \|website=The Times of India \|language=en}}

	He is also ~~involved~~ in ~~the~~ ~~legal~~ ~~case~~ seeking to ~~declare~~ the [[Shahi Eidgah mosque (Mathura)]] ~~a Hindu temple~~.{{Cite web\|title=Hari Shankar Jain & Vishnu Shankar Jain: Father-son lawyer duo spearheading legal battle for Hindu shrines \|url=https://www.pgurus.com/hari-shankar-jain-vishnu-shankar-jain-father-son-lawyer-duo-spearheading-legal-battle-for-hindu-shrines/\|website=www.pgurus.com\|date=29 May 2022 \|access-date=2026-01-30}}{{Cite news \|date=2023-12-15 \|title=Supreme Court refuses to stay Krishna Janmabhoomi survey order \|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/supreme-court-refuses-to-stay-krishna-janmabhoomi-survey-order/articleshow/106016875.cms \|access-date=2026-02-23 \|work=The Times of India \|issn=0971-8257}}{{Cite web \|title=India court allows survey of historic mosque to see if it stands on temple \|url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/8/3/india-court-allows-survey-of-historic-mosque-to-see-if-it-stands-on-temple \|access-date=2026-02-25 \|website=Al Jazeera \|language=en}}		He also represented a petition to [[Allahabad High Court]] seeking a survey of the [[Shahi Eidgah mosque (Mathura)]].{{Cite web\|title=Hari Shankar Jain & Vishnu Shankar Jain: Father-son lawyer duo spearheading legal battle for Hindu shrines \|url=https://www.pgurus.com/hari-shankar-jain-vishnu-shankar-jain-father-son-lawyer-duo-spearheading-legal-battle-for-hindu-shrines/\|website=www.pgurus.com\|date=29 May 2022 \|access-date=2026-01-30}}{{Cite news \|date=2023-12-15 \|title=Supreme Court refuses to stay Krishna Janmabhoomi survey order \|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/supreme-court-refuses-to-stay-krishna-janmabhoomi-survey-order/articleshow/106016875.cms \|access-date=2026-02-23 \|work=The Times of India \|issn=0971-8257}}{{Cite web \|title=India court allows survey of historic mosque to see if it stands on temple \|url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/8/3/india-court-allows-survey-of-historic-mosque-to-see-if-it-stands-on-temple \|access-date=2026-02-25 \|website=Al Jazeera \|language=en}}

	Jain also petitioner in the Supreme Court of India challenging the practice of '''VIP darshan''' at the [[Mahakaleshwar Temple]] in Ujjain.{{Cite news \|last=Bureau \|first=The Hindu \|date=2026-01-27 \|title=Supreme Court refuses to entertain plea against ‘VIP darshan’ at Ujjain Mahakal temple \|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/madhya-pradesh/supreme-court-refuses-to-entertain-plea-against-vip-darshan-at-mahakal-temple/article70555873.ece \|access-date=2026-02-16 \|work=The Hindu \|language=en-IN \|issn=0971-751X}}{{Cite web \|date=2026-01-27 \|title=‘In Mahakal’s presence, nobody is VIP’: SC declines to entertain appeal challenging Madhya Pradesh HC against ‘VIP darshan’ at Ujjain Mahakaleshwar Temple \|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/legal-news/in-mahakals-presence-nobody-is-vip-sc-declines-to-entertain-appeal-challenging-madhya-pradesh-hc-against-vip-darshan-at-ujjain-mahakaleshwar-temple-10497032/ \|access-date=2026-02-16 \|website=The Indian Express \|language=en}}{{Cite web \|date=2026-01-27 \|title=‘Nobody can be VIP in Mahakaal’s presence': Supreme Court on plea against entry into Ujjain temple sanctum \|url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/sc-declines-to-entertain-plea-against-vip-entry-into-mahakal-temple-sanctum-101769501822770.html \|access-date=2026-02-16 \|website=Hindustan Times \|language=en}}		Jain also petitioner in the Supreme Court of India challenging the practice of '''VIP darshan''' at the [[Mahakaleshwar Temple]] in Ujjain.{{Cite news \|last=Bureau \|first=The Hindu \|date=2026-01-27 \|title=Supreme Court refuses to entertain plea against ‘VIP darshan’ at Ujjain Mahakal temple \|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/madhya-pradesh/supreme-court-refuses-to-entertain-plea-against-vip-darshan-at-mahakal-temple/article70555873.ece \|access-date=2026-02-16 \|work=The Hindu \|language=en-IN \|issn=0971-751X}}{{Cite web \|date=2026-01-27 \|title=‘In Mahakal’s presence, nobody is VIP’: SC declines to entertain appeal challenging Madhya Pradesh HC against ‘VIP darshan’ at Ujjain Mahakaleshwar Temple \|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/legal-news/in-mahakals-presence-nobody-is-vip-sc-declines-to-entertain-appeal-challenging-madhya-pradesh-hc-against-vip-darshan-at-ujjain-mahakaleshwar-temple-10497032/ \|access-date=2026-02-16 \|website=The Indian Express \|language=en}}{{Cite web \|date=2026-01-27 \|title=‘Nobody can be VIP in Mahakaal’s presence': Supreme Court on plea against entry into Ujjain temple sanctum \|url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/sc-declines-to-entertain-plea-against-vip-entry-into-mahakal-temple-sanctum-101769501822770.html \|access-date=2026-02-16 \|website=Hindustan Times \|language=en}}

LEGAL_NOTICE: This website acts solely as an automated content aggregator. We do not host, store, or upload any media shown above. All content is indexed via machine logic from external sources.

READ FULL SOURCE

← Previous revision		Revision as of 20:19, 27 February 2026
Line 26:		Line 26:
	He was a petitioner to demand the survey of the existing [[Gyanvapi Mosque]] complex where he claimed a "[[Lingam]]" was discovered.{{Cite news\|title=Gyanvapi dispute {{!}} Now, masjid panel too seeks removal of Vishnu Shankar Jain over 'conflict'\|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/gyanvapi-dispute-now-masjid-panel-too-seeks-removal-of-vishnu-shankar-jain-over-conflict/article65636033.ece\|work=The Hindu\|date=2022-07-13\|access-date=2026-01-30\|issn=0971-751X\|language=en-IN\|first=Abhinay\|last=Lakshman}}{{Cite web\|title=Gyanvapi case: The father-son lawyer duo at centre of string of petitions\|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/political-pulse/the-sunday-profile-father-son-and-holy-suits-7941735/\|website=The Indian Express\|date=2022-09-12\|access-date=2026-01-30\|language=en}}{{Cite web \|title=“Not legally possible…” Vishnu Shankar Jain as petitioner seeks out-of-court settlement in Gyanvapi case \|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/videos/news/not-legally-possible-vishnu-shankar-jain-as-petitioner-seeks-out-of-court-settlement-in-gyanvapi-case/videoshow/102809401.cms \|access-date=2026-02-23 \|website=The Times of India \|language=en}}		He was a petitioner to demand the survey of the existing [[Gyanvapi Mosque]] complex where he claimed a "[[Lingam]]" was discovered.{{Cite news\|title=Gyanvapi dispute {{!}} Now, masjid panel too seeks removal of Vishnu Shankar Jain over 'conflict'\|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/gyanvapi-dispute-now-masjid-panel-too-seeks-removal-of-vishnu-shankar-jain-over-conflict/article65636033.ece\|work=The Hindu\|date=2022-07-13\|access-date=2026-01-30\|issn=0971-751X\|language=en-IN\|first=Abhinay\|last=Lakshman}}{{Cite web\|title=Gyanvapi case: The father-son lawyer duo at centre of string of petitions\|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/political-pulse/the-sunday-profile-father-son-and-holy-suits-7941735/\|website=The Indian Express\|date=2022-09-12\|access-date=2026-01-30\|language=en}}{{Cite web \|title=“Not legally possible…” Vishnu Shankar Jain as petitioner seeks out-of-court settlement in Gyanvapi case \|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/videos/news/not-legally-possible-vishnu-shankar-jain-as-petitioner-seeks-out-of-court-settlement-in-gyanvapi-case/videoshow/102809401.cms \|access-date=2026-02-23 \|website=The Times of India \|language=en}}

	He is also ~~involved~~ in ~~the~~ ~~legal~~ ~~case~~ seeking to ~~declare~~ the [[Shahi Eidgah mosque (Mathura)]] ~~a Hindu temple~~.{{Cite web\|title=Hari Shankar Jain & Vishnu Shankar Jain: Father-son lawyer duo spearheading legal battle for Hindu shrines \|url=https://www.pgurus.com/hari-shankar-jain-vishnu-shankar-jain-father-son-lawyer-duo-spearheading-legal-battle-for-hindu-shrines/\|website=www.pgurus.com\|date=29 May 2022 \|access-date=2026-01-30}}{{Cite news \|date=2023-12-15 \|title=Supreme Court refuses to stay Krishna Janmabhoomi survey order \|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/supreme-court-refuses-to-stay-krishna-janmabhoomi-survey-order/articleshow/106016875.cms \|access-date=2026-02-23 \|work=The Times of India \|issn=0971-8257}}{{Cite web \|title=India court allows survey of historic mosque to see if it stands on temple \|url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/8/3/india-court-allows-survey-of-historic-mosque-to-see-if-it-stands-on-temple \|access-date=2026-02-25 \|website=Al Jazeera \|language=en}}		He also represented a petition to [[Allahabad High Court]] seeking a survey of the [[Shahi Eidgah mosque (Mathura)]].{{Cite web\|title=Hari Shankar Jain & Vishnu Shankar Jain: Father-son lawyer duo spearheading legal battle for Hindu shrines \|url=https://www.pgurus.com/hari-shankar-jain-vishnu-shankar-jain-father-son-lawyer-duo-spearheading-legal-battle-for-hindu-shrines/\|website=www.pgurus.com\|date=29 May 2022 \|access-date=2026-01-30}}{{Cite news \|date=2023-12-15 \|title=Supreme Court refuses to stay Krishna Janmabhoomi survey order \|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/supreme-court-refuses-to-stay-krishna-janmabhoomi-survey-order/articleshow/106016875.cms \|access-date=2026-02-23 \|work=The Times of India \|issn=0971-8257}}{{Cite web \|title=India court allows survey of historic mosque to see if it stands on temple \|url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/8/3/india-court-allows-survey-of-historic-mosque-to-see-if-it-stands-on-temple \|access-date=2026-02-25 \|website=Al Jazeera \|language=en}}

	Jain also petitioner in the Supreme Court of India challenging the practice of '''VIP darshan''' at the [[Mahakaleshwar Temple]] in Ujjain.{{Cite news \|last=Bureau \|first=The Hindu \|date=2026-01-27 \|title=Supreme Court refuses to entertain plea against ‘VIP darshan’ at Ujjain Mahakal temple \|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/madhya-pradesh/supreme-court-refuses-to-entertain-plea-against-vip-darshan-at-mahakal-temple/article70555873.ece \|access-date=2026-02-16 \|work=The Hindu \|language=en-IN \|issn=0971-751X}}{{Cite web \|date=2026-01-27 \|title=‘In Mahakal’s presence, nobody is VIP’: SC declines to entertain appeal challenging Madhya Pradesh HC against ‘VIP darshan’ at Ujjain Mahakaleshwar Temple \|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/legal-news/in-mahakals-presence-nobody-is-vip-sc-declines-to-entertain-appeal-challenging-madhya-pradesh-hc-against-vip-darshan-at-ujjain-mahakaleshwar-temple-10497032/ \|access-date=2026-02-16 \|website=The Indian Express \|language=en}}{{Cite web \|date=2026-01-27 \|title=‘Nobody can be VIP in Mahakaal’s presence': Supreme Court on plea against entry into Ujjain temple sanctum \|url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/sc-declines-to-entertain-plea-against-vip-entry-into-mahakal-temple-sanctum-101769501822770.html \|access-date=2026-02-16 \|website=Hindustan Times \|language=en}}		Jain also petitioner in the Supreme Court of India challenging the practice of '''VIP darshan''' at the [[Mahakaleshwar Temple]] in Ujjain.{{Cite news \|last=Bureau \|first=The Hindu \|date=2026-01-27 \|title=Supreme Court refuses to entertain plea against ‘VIP darshan’ at Ujjain Mahakal temple \|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/madhya-pradesh/supreme-court-refuses-to-entertain-plea-against-vip-darshan-at-mahakal-temple/article70555873.ece \|access-date=2026-02-16 \|work=The Hindu \|language=en-IN \|issn=0971-751X}}{{Cite web \|date=2026-01-27 \|title=‘In Mahakal’s presence, nobody is VIP’: SC declines to entertain appeal challenging Madhya Pradesh HC against ‘VIP darshan’ at Ujjain Mahakaleshwar Temple \|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/legal-news/in-mahakals-presence-nobody-is-vip-sc-declines-to-entertain-appeal-challenging-madhya-pradesh-hc-against-vip-darshan-at-ujjain-mahakaleshwar-temple-10497032/ \|access-date=2026-02-16 \|website=The Indian Express \|language=en}}{{Cite web \|date=2026-01-27 \|title=‘Nobody can be VIP in Mahakaal’s presence': Supreme Court on plea against entry into Ujjain temple sanctum \|url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/sc-declines-to-entertain-plea-against-vip-entry-into-mahakal-temple-sanctum-101769501822770.html \|access-date=2026-02-16 \|website=Hindustan Times \|language=en}}

[INIT_REPORT_SEQUENCE]