Add a new entry BELOW THIS LINE copying the format: {{subst:drv2|page=|xfd_page=|reason=}} ~~~~ -->

Add a new entry BELOW THIS LINE copying the format: {{subst:drv2|page=|xfd_page=|reason=}} ~~~~ -->

====[[:Manish Kejriwal]]====

==== [[:Manish Kejriwal]] (closed) ====

{| class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed mw-archivedtalk" style="width: 100%; text-align: left; border: 0px; margin-top: 0.2em;"

|-

! style="background-color: #f2dfce; font-weight:normal; text-align:left;" |

* '''[[:Manish Kejriwal]]''' – Restored by the deleting admin. Anyone is welcome to renominate at AfD. Nothing else for us to do here. [[User:OwenX|Owen×]] [[User talk:OwenX|☎]] 14:31, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

|-

| style="text-align:center;" | ''The following is an archived debate of the [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]] of the page above. '''Please do not modify it.'''''

|-

| style="border: solid 1px silver; padding: 8px; background-color: white;" |

:{{DRV links|Manish Kejriwal|xfd_page=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manish Kejriwal (2nd nomination)|article=Manish Kejriwal}}

:{{DRV links|Manish Kejriwal|xfd_page=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manish Kejriwal (2nd nomination)|article=Manish Kejriwal}}

I am requesting a review of the G4 deletion of [[Manish Kejriwal]] by SouthernNights. I contend that the [[WP:G4]] criterion was misapplied as the recreated page was not “substantially identical” to the deleted version. WP:G4 is intended as a mechanical / binary check to identify identical or minimally altered content. On their talk page, the deleting admin acknowledged the improvements, stating: “You are correct that there are new citations and information... [but] it hadn't been improved sufficiently”. This suggests that the deletion was based on a subjective assessment of the new sourcing rather than the procedural identity check required by G4. Once new information and new citations is acknowledged, the substantially identical threshold is no longer met. This version was a substantial rework incorporating multiple new independent secondary sources and expanded coverage to address previous concerns. The article was reviewed and passed by a seasoned NPP reviewer. This indicates that the page was not a blatant recreation and possessed enough merit to exist in the mainspace. I therefore request the article be restored. [[User:HibaShaikh|HibaShaikh]] ([[User talk:HibaShaikh|talk]]) 10:25, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

I am requesting a review of the G4 deletion of [[Manish Kejriwal]] by SouthernNights. I contend that the [[WP:G4]] criterion was misapplied as the recreated page was not “substantially identical” to the deleted version. WP:G4 is intended as a mechanical / binary check to identify identical or minimally altered content. On their talk page, the deleting admin acknowledged the improvements, stating: “You are correct that there are new citations and information... [but] it hadn't been improved sufficiently”. This suggests that the deletion was based on a subjective assessment of the new sourcing rather than the procedural identity check required by G4. Once new information and new citations is acknowledged, the substantially identical threshold is no longer met. This version was a substantial rework incorporating multiple new independent secondary sources and expanded coverage to address previous concerns. The article was reviewed and passed by a seasoned NPP reviewer. This indicates that the page was not a blatant recreation and possessed enough merit to exist in the mainspace. I therefore request the article be restored. [[User:HibaShaikh|HibaShaikh]] ([[User talk:HibaShaikh|talk]]) 10:25, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

* This article has been plagued with repeated sockpuppet attempts to prop it up and lacks significant coverage proving notability. While the article has new citations since the last AfD, they are not significant and in my opinion this was basically the same article that was previously deleted. That's why I thought SD applied b/c this isn't a rewritten article, it's the same article trying again. But since [[User:OwenX|Owen×]] disagrees I've undeleted the article and others can deal with the issue related to it. --[[User:SouthernNights|SouthernNights]] ([[User talk:SouthernNights|talk]]) 12:20, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

* This article has been plagued with repeated sockpuppet attempts to prop it up and lacks significant coverage proving notability. While the article has new citations since the last AfD, they are not significant and in my opinion this was basically the same article that was previously deleted. That's why I thought SD applied b/c this isn't a rewritten article, it's the same article trying again. But since [[User:OwenX|Owen×]] disagrees I've undeleted the article and others can deal with the issue related to it. --[[User:SouthernNights|SouthernNights]] ([[User talk:SouthernNights|talk]]) 12:20, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

|-

| style="text-align:center;" | ''The above is an archive of the [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]] of the page listed in the heading. '''Please do not modify it.'''''

|}